Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash (DeepSeek) and Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) by price, context, capabilities, and latency.
Side by side
Compare price, provider, context, capabilities, latency, and source basis.
| Model | Provider | Input | Output | Context | Capabilities | Best for | Latency | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek-v4-flash | DeepSeek | $0.112 / 1M tokens | $0.224 / 1M tokens | 128k | Tool callingJSON modeLong contextReasoning | low-cost Chinese tasks, long-context summary | 700-2200ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
| Google: Gemini 2.5 Progoogle/gemini-2.5-pro | $1.25 / 1M tokens | $10 / 1M tokens | 1M | Tool callingVisionJSON modeLong context | long-context analysis, vision workflows | 1500-5000ms | Catalog | OpenRouter if available |
FAQ
DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper ($0.112 / 1M tokens input / $0.224 / 1M tokens output) vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25 / 1M tokens input / $10 / 1M tokens output). Actual cost depends on your input/output token mix — estimate it with the pricing calculator.
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro is larger (1M tokens) vs 128k tokens.
Both target Long context. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash to optimize cost, or Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro for the longer context window. Test both on real prompts before committing production traffic.